Here is a report from John Healy MP, former labour Housing Minister on the Housing Vrisis – worth a read
HAs as pulic bodies – latest
The Office for National Statistics will complete its review of whether housing associations are public bodies within weeks.
Inside Housing revealed this month the Office for National Statistics (ONS) is considering whether housing associations should be reclassified as part of the public sector.
In an update the ONS confirmed the review was underway and was likely to complete in October.
According to Inside Housing:
” If the reclassification goes ahead, it would mean associations’ combined £60bn of debt would be added to the government balance sheet – sparking fears that the government would seek to control or limit their activity.
However, the ONS took the unusual step of issuing a clarification confirming that a reclassification “would not affect the legal ownership or management structures of organisations”.
It also confirmed in its statement that government control could occur through regulation, as well as legislation.
It has presented this as one of the primary reasons housing associations should introduce the Right to Buy voluntarily.
The ONS said the review was triggered by “a number of new government controls” introduced between 2008 and 2015 – including changes introduced through the Housing and Regeneration, and Localism Acts.
In a statement, the ONS said: “In assessing whether an organisation is public or private, a fundamental question is, ‘Does government exercise significant control over the general corporate policy of the unit?’.
“The international guidance defines control as the power to determine general corporate policy, and this can be exercised through the appointment of directors and control of over half of the shareholders’ voting power, through special legislation, decree or regulation.” “
Latest Diversity news
Here you go:
Have you though about the tenant mentoring into work programem yet – or Board Member mentoring?
RTB – a view from ACS
At the NHF conference here in Birmingham last week, Greg Clark put forward a challenging decision for Housing Associations (HAs): sign up to give tenants a voluntary right to buy (VRTB) or be compelled to do so under new legislation, say our friends at Anthony Collins Solicitors.
“HA boards need to get to grips quickly with the proposals and make a decision which could greatly impact upon the relationship between the Government and the housing sector in the future.
The voluntary proposal
The starting position is that all social and affordable rent tenants would be entitled to the VRTB with a discount at the same rate as under the RTB (£103,900 in London and £77,900 elsewhere).
HAs would have discretion not to sell certain properties (e.g. rural areas, adapted properties – i.e. much wider exceptions than are currently the case) and offer an alternative; what the NHF is calling a ‘portable discount’.
A cost floor calculation would apply recognising that properties should not be sold for less than the costs of acquisition/outstanding debt associated with the property (akin to the net and peak debt exception in the right to acquire).
A strict timescale would be put in place which HAs must comply with. This would be enforced by the Regulator, which would have a key role in reviewing HA decision-making and considering tenant complaints. There is an indication in the guidelines that the Regulator could introduce a new Regulatory Standard to cover this, intended to measure the amount of home ownership facilitated by an HA and whether HAs are demonstrating a genuine presumption to sell in favour of tenants.
The proposal talks about introducing measures to tackle fraud and speculative tenant applications (including an up-front fee payable by the tenant and refundable on completion).
In return, the Government would guarantee full compensation for the discount provided that the HA replaces that property (70% payable on completion and 30% with a start on site). HAs would collectively need to ensure that at least one property is brought into HA ownership to replace each property sold under this voluntary scheme. HAs would have 3 years to replace each home. The mechanisms for replacement would be wide: development, open market purchase, revival of empty homes or working with other HAs.
Any grant associated with the property would be recycled through the Recycled Capital Grant Fund (or similar). For LSVT associations, the NHF envisage that local authorities will not have any clawback on receipts. Given that this could require a contract change to LSVTs’ transfer agreements, and that the Regulator and the Government has previously indicated it had no appetite to intrude into that contractual relationship, it is not surprising that the proposals at this stage give no detail on how this will be achieved.
Alongside the VRTB, HAs would be committing to extend home ownership opportunities for tenants and working with the Government to put other schemes in place to achieve this.
The proposal contains a statement to the effect that the Government would put in place arrangements to manage the financial costs of the VRTB policy. The Government wishes to restrict that cost to the value of receipts received from the sale of high value council assets. Ring-fencing of receipts from the sale of London council housing for reuse in London alone would create a very difficult issue and potentially this could involve an annual cap on the total discount amount. There is no detail on what this would be and how it would work.
Key questions
When deciding whether to accept the VRTB by the deadline of 5pm on Friday 2 October, HAs should be asking themselves some key questions:
- Would your organisation benefit from the flexibility of offering tenants a ‘portable discount’ in order for you to retain adapted/rural properties (an exemption which is not available with the current RTB)?
- Would open market receipts enable you to replace properties on a one-for-one basis?
- If the receipts are likely to be insufficient for replacement, do you have adequate “top up” funding?
- Is development of new homes an option for you and, if not, do you have good relationships with neighbouring developing associations? Would the alternative options of purchase/bringing empty homes back into use be viable?
- For LSVT organisations, will the voluntary scheme be caught by your clawback arrangements? Check the wording of your transfer agreement, as it may not be sufficient to expect the Regulator or the Government to intervene, if you are caught.
- Are you prepared to support the Government’s wider proposal to develop other schemes to enable home ownership options for tenants?
- Do you have the resources in place to deal with an influx of applications within strict timescales?
- How does this option fit in with your organisational and tenant values?
- Will you have an asset cover issue?
- Given that the policy is voluntary and not statutory, if your organisation is charitable, how will you square the requirement to provide housing only to those unable to house themselves on the open market? Will those people exercising the VRTB fall into that category and, if not, what does this mean for your organisation’s charitable compliance?
What happens next?
HAs must respond in the form provided by the NHF by this Friday 2 October.
If the majority of HAs sign up then the NHF and the Government will set up a working group to work out the finer details: when it comes in, all HAs will be expected to participate (regardless of whether they have signed up).
If the proposal is not supported by the majority, the Government will set out a new statutory RTB in the Housing Bill although, to be clear, this would not be nationalisation by the back door. It does not mean that the Government (as opposed to your tenants) has any greater right to get its hands on your assets as it currently does. However, it is clear that the VRTB proposal that is on the table is potentially more flexible and accommodating than the corresponding statutory one is likely to be. The ultimate question is whether, if the sector rejected VRTB, the Government could implement its proposed statutory Right-to-Buy without significant dilution by the House of Lords?
So what will the future of the Right to Buy be? In the words of Greg Clark, “that is for you collectively to decide”.
What else? “Elephant in room” time
- VRTB and charitablity is very much a live issue to be resolved;
- Surely the Government will have to include provisions providing power to the HCA in the Housing Bill to compel HAs who might otherwise not wish to participate?
- Lenders would not be compelled to discharge properties subject to VRTB unlike the position with RTB and RTA so how would that work in practice;
- How will the Government prevent local authorities from enforcing s106 agreements (though rural schemes might be safe, the fact is that HAs would be unable to comply with typical existing s106 agreements)?
For more information
If you would like to talk to one of our experts about the implications of VRTB v statutory Right-to-Buy to your organisation, please contactJonathan Cox or Emma Holmes.”
No guarantee on rent reduction exception for supported homes
The government has decided against exempting all supported housing from the 1% rent cut, an official document has confirmed.
Accoridng to Inside Housing:
“An impact assessment of the policy, which was published on Monday, said “a complete exception for supported accommodation has been considered but is regarded as disproportionate”.
Providers of ‘specialised supported’ accommodation are unlikely to have to reduce rents by 1% over four years, as laid out by the Welfare Reform and Work Bill.
However, sector figures have said very few properties are classed as ‘specialised supported housing’.
Such housing usually has to offer ‘a high level of support’ for residents, receive no or negligible public subsidy, and have been commissioned in line with local health, social services or Supporting People strategies.
The impact assessment added: “We are considering whether the existing definitions are appropriate in light of the revised policy and will be setting out details in secondary legislation and working with the sector to ensure regulations laid out under Clause 20 of the bill protect vulnerable groups.
“Housing providers will be able to apply for an exemption from the rent reductions where financial viability is threatened. Excluding specific vulnerable groups on the face of the bill from the rent reduction policy change, with no prior evidence that it was needed, would raise serious questions of fairness and lead to a negative impact on protected groups.”
According to the National Housing Federation, a large provider of supported housing estimates that the change would lead to the loss of 104 schemes, including 228 spaces in domestic violence services.
The impact assessment also said the rent reduction would have “no impact on the majority of social housing tenants”.
This is because the two-thirds of social tenants who receive housing benefit will have their claim reduced when their rent goes down.“
S 21 notices
From 1 October 2015 the Deregulation Act 2015, together with related regulations bring in a raft of changes for housing providers. These include significant changes to the procedures and requirements for s.21 notices, tenancy deposit protection and prohibiting retaliatory eviction by private landlords. Don’t get caught out! Take note of the changes below.
UPDATE: the s21 Regulations have, as of today, been amended as there was a serious error in the prescribed section 21 notice form. This has now been rectified and the correct section 21 notice can be accessed using the link at the bottom of the page. This note has also been updated to clarify some important points from our earlier briefing.
New Rules and Form for section 21
There is a new prescribed form for s.21 which must be used for new ASTs which started on or after 1 October 2015. It may also be used for existing tenancies. It does not have to be used for periodic tenancies created after 1 October on the expiry/rolling over of a fixed term which began before 1 October 2015.
Do note that the original new section 21 prescribed form notice contained an error at part 3, which said that the notice is only valid for four months from the date of issue for periodic tenancies. This is incorrect. The notice is valid for four months from the date after which possession could be required.
There are also further regulations as follows (hardly “deregulation”!):
- Gone are the days of serving a s.21 notice at the start of a tenancy. No s.21 notice can be served within the first 4 months of an AST;
- Proceedings for possession can no longer be started within the first 6 months of the tenancy;
- As now clarified – Landlords essentially have 6 months from the date of issue of the s21 notice to start proceedings under fixed term ASTs. For properties under rolling/periodic tenancies the notice is valid for 4 months from the date after which possession could be required, (which is in effect 6 months) otherwise the notice expires;
- The requirement that the s.21 notice must expire on the last day of a period of a tenancy is gone! From 1st October, 2 months’ notice is all that is required for all ASTs now, which could therefore end in the middle of a ‘period of the tenancy’. As a result the tenant is given a right to claim back pro-rata rent if already paid in advance (s40 contains a simple repayment formula);
- For the few periodic ASTs granted with a quarterly or 6 monthly period of the tenancy (rare, save in the private rented sector) then the notice period cannot be shorter than a period of the tenancy. So, if there is a quarterly periodic tenancy, the s21 notice must give 3 months’ notice from date of service;
- For ASTs that begin after 1 October 2015 a section 21 notice can no longer be served/valid unless the tenant has already been provided with:
- An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the property – which Landlords are (in most circumstances) already under an obligation to provide before the commencement of the tenancy; and
- A current gas safety certificate – which again, landlords are already under an obligation to supply to the tenant before they occupy the premises and after every annual check.
If the tenant has not had these 2 documents before (despite the fact that would be a breach of the other regulations which require landlords to provide them at the start of the tenancy), serve them before or with the s21 notice. They do not need to be served again with the s21 notice if they were issued at the tenancy start date.
Failure to comply with the above mean ‘no fault’ possession (accelerated possession proceedings) cannot be used until they are complied with.
Registered providers of social housing, unlike private sector landlords,escape a further requirement, to supply tenants on service of a s21 notice with an up to date version of the DCLG booklet “How to rent: the checklist for renting in England”.
The new rules initially apply only to ASTs in England granted on or after 1st October 2015. After 3 years (i.e. after 1 October 2018), they will apply to all AST tenancies whenever they began.
Preventing retaliatory eviction
This has been a hot topic in the media (landlords evicting tenants for complaining about disrepair). The Government has responded by introducing a somewhat convoluted procedure to regulate the issue, throwing in further amendments to the s.21 procedure for private landlords. Private registered providers of social housing are, however, specifically exempted from these requirements. (Section 31).
These steps are however likely to increase the number of requests for local authorities to serve Improvement notices.
Tenancy deposits
These new provisions under the Act have been in force from 26 March 2015 and introduce rules about the provision of information to tenants and sanctions for non-compliance. There is a ban on section 21 notices being served at a time when the deposit is not being held in accordance with an authorised scheme (s.31).
Action Required
The Act and new Regulations mean you need to:
- Review policies and procedures for ASTs;
- Change the s.21 notice form being used;
- Make sure EPCs and gas safety certificates are served at the start of tenancies failing which serve before/with section 21 notices;
- Double check compliance re tenancy deposits e.g. for any market rent or keyworker ASTs.
How can we help?
- We are offering updating s21 notice training to avoid being inadvertently tripped up by the new rules.
- We will cover these changes in outline at our Housing Management Law Update on 11 November 2015 10am-12.30pm at our offices. Click here to book.
- The new and updated section 21 notice form is available here.
- Clients can request a Word version of the new section 21 notice by emailing Katey.Slaughter@anthonycollins.com.
- If you own or manage private sector housing in a non registered body, then see our private sector focused briefing.
For more information
Contact Helen Tucker.”
And for private landlords and sme charities….. the following advice
” Important Possession Changes affecting Private Landlords from 1 October 2015
The Deregulation Act 2015, coupled with the new Regulations, introduce changes to the process for seeking possession using s21 notices. This briefing focuses on the rules that apply exclusively to private landlords, charities and churches as well as market rent/keyworker/student homes owned or managed by the parts of housing associations not registered with the HCA.
Clearly this is also relevant to local authorities monitoring the private rented sector. We also cover other changes that apply from 1 October 2015.
Do note that the Regulations have, as of today, been amended as there was a serious error in the prescribed section 21 notice. This has now been rectified and the correct section 21 notice can be accessed using the link at the bottom of the page (see section on ‘Other important changes, below, for further details).
S21 notices
For assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs) that begin after 1 October 2015 a section 21 notice can no longer be served/is valid unless the tenant has already been provided with:
- An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the property – which Landlords are (in most circumstances) already under an obligation to provide before the commencement of the tenancy;
- A current gas safety certificate – which again, landlords are already under an obligation to supply to the tenant before they occupy the premises and after every annual check; and
- For private landlords only, a copy of the CLG booklet “How to rent: the checklist for renting in England”. This can be found by clicking here.
- If the booklet is provided at the tenancy start date or at any time later, a further copy does not need to be provided to a tenant with the s21 notice. However if a new version of the booklet has been published before the start of a replacement tenancy (e.g. second fixed term tenancy granted immediately on expiry of previous fixed term) the updated booklet does need to be served before or with the s21 notice.
If the tenant has not had these 3 documents before (despite the fact that would be a breach of the other regulations which require landlords to provide them at the start of the tenancy!), serve them before or with the s21 notice.
We also suggest that landlords obtain permission from the tenant at the tenancy sign up to accept service of the DCLG booklet by email to a specific email address so as to avoid having to serve a hard copy.
Retaliatory Eviction
New provisions for private landlords also come into effect for all new ASTs granted on or after 1 October 2015 aimed at preventing retaliatory eviction for reporting disrepair. However, the regulations set out an elaborate procedure which must be followed before a section 21 is invalid.
Essentially, the rules provide that a section 21 notice cannot be given within 6 months of a landlord receiving an Improvement Notice from the local authority in respect of a property. However to get to this point:
- The tenant must first make a written complaint to their landlord;
- The landlord has 14 days to provide an ‘adequate’ response;
- If not, the tenant must complain to the local housing authority;
- The local authority should then inspect the property and serve the improvement notice; and
- Any section 21 notice issued after the tenant’s written complaint is invalid, and any ongoing possession proceedings will be struck out. However, if an order for possession has already been granted, the Council’s notice has no effect.
Registered providers of social housing are exempt from this requirement. The legislation also does not apply retrospectively to existing tenancies, and thus only provides protection for tenants on ASTs granted after the 1 October 2015.
Other important changes
The irony of the ‘Deregulation’ Act is that it introduces a whole new scheme of regulation for section 21 notices which apply across the board to all landlords! The important changes are listed below:
- There is a new prescribed form for section 21 notices which must be used for all ASTs which started on or after 1 October 2015; this can also be used for tenancies that began earlier if you choose to. Do note that the original new section 21 notice first published 7 September 2015 contained an error at part 3, which said that the notice is only valid for four months from the date of issue for periodic tenancies – this is wrong! The notice is valid for four months from the date after which possession could be required (which is in effect 6 months);
- A section 21 notice cannot be served within the first 4 months of an AST;
- As now clarified – Landlords essentially have 6 months from the date of issue of the s21 notice to start proceedings under fixed term ASTs. For properties under rolling/periodic tenancies the form is valid for 4 months from the date after which possession could be required, otherwise the notice expires;
- The requirement that the section 21 notices must expire on the last day of a period of a tenancy is no more – 2 months notice is all that is required. But for ASTs granted with a quarterly or 6 monthly period of tenancy (less common), the notice period cannot be shorter than that period of the tenancy;
- There is a ban on section 21 notices being served at a time when the tenancy deposit is not held in accordance with an authorised scheme, so make sure you are complying with the rules on tenancy deposits.
The new rules initially apply only to ASTs in England granted on or after 1 October 2015. After 3 years (i.e. after 1 October 2018), they will apply to all ASTs whenever they began.
Action required
The Act and new Regulations mean you need to:
- Make sure EPCs and gas safety certificates are served at the start of tenancies failing which serve before/with section 21 notices;
- Ensure that the DCLG booklet is issued to tenants at the outset of their tenancies and serve and updated version where a ‘new’ replacement tenancy is granted (where relevant);
- Use the new section 21 notice prescribed form for ASTs beginning after 1 October 2015;
- Double check your compliance with tenancy deposit regulations;
- Obtain a tenant’s email address at sign up and ask them to agree it can be used for service of notices and other documents in connection with the tenancy.
How can we help?
- The new and updated section 21 notice form is available here.
- Clients can request a Word version of the section 21 notice by emailing Katey.Slaughter@anthonycollins.com.
For more information
Contact Helen Tucker.”
Devloution – latest bids from 38 cities
The most radical shake up of local governance in a generation has taken a giant step forward this week with 38 landmark devolution proposals from cities, towns and counties across the United Kingdom being made to government.
This information comes from the Governments own website:
” Each area has submitted ambitious proposals to take control of how public money is spent in their local area, the Prime Minister announced today (11 September 2015).
Earlier this summer the Chancellor asked areas to put forward proposals to follow in the footsteps of Greater Manchester’s ground-breaking devolution deal with government last year.
The volume of bids clearly demonstrates the significant appetite to be part of a devolution revolution across the country, with local leaders signing up in droves to the Chancellor’s vision of an accountable elected mayor leading strong regional areas who look after their own affairs.
Bids have come in from the length and breadth of the country including Liverpool City Region, the North East, Gloucestershire and the West Midlands.
The 38 bids received ahead of the deadline last Friday include the application for powers in a wide range of spending areas including education, transport, healthcare, housing and business support.
Speaking today Prime Minister David Cameron said:
Spreading opportunity, increasing social mobility, helping people get on – these aims run through this government like letters through a stick of rock.
The best businesses would never shy away from allowing their customers to shape the way they improve their services. If we are bold enough, government can go one better by actually putting many of those services in the hands of local people. It is also a proven reality that money spent closer to people is often money spent wiser – so we can really deliver more for less.
Chancellor George Osborne said:
Earlier this summer I asked local leaders to come forward with their ideas to build on our radical devolution plans. We have had hugely ambitious proposals from all over the country showing that local areas are as enthusiastic as I am about shifting power out of Whitehall.
What we are delivering in the Northern Powerhouse through our ground-breaking deal with Greater Manchester illustrates what can be achieved by working together – the challenge is now to make this happen in other great cities.
Communities Secretary Greg Clark said:
This ‘one nation government’ is determined to ensure power is devolved from Whitehall to town halls, to put an end to the old north-south divide and rebalance our economy.
The sheer volume of bids we’ve received, from cities and counties, demonstrates how local leaders are embracing this opportunity to have a direct hand in shaping the future of their area, whether in skills, transport, housing or healthcare.
I look forward to us working with each of these areas in the coming weeks and months to turn their proposals into reality.
Successful future deals from the proposals announced today will be supported through the Cities and Local Government Devolution Billcurrently passing through Parliament. The proposals will now be considered as part of the Spending Review process.
The Bill puts in place the legal framework across the country that will make it simpler for devolving more powers to more places and sets out far reaching powers to be devolved to Greater Manchester and for creating a city-wide elected metro mayor.
The full list of areas submitting proposals for devolution deals is below. It includes areas who have already agreed deals seeking further devolved powers. Besides the proposals listed below, government also received a number of other representations and letters of support related to devolution, all of which will be considered carefully.
Full list of devolution proposals received on 4 September | |
---|---|
1 | *Aberdeen |
2 | *Cardiff |
3 | Cheshire and Warrington |
4 | Cornwall |
5 | Cumbria |
6 | Dorset |
7 | ‘D2N2’ – Derbyshire, Derby, Nottinghamshire and Nottingham |
8 | *Edinburgh |
9 | Gloucestershire |
10 | Greater Brighton |
11 | Greater Essex |
12 | Greater Lincolnshire |
13 | Greater Manchester |
14 | Greater Yorkshire |
15 | Hampshire & Isle of Wight |
16 | Heart of the South West |
17 | Herefordshire |
18 | Hull, Yorkshire, Leeds City Region and the Northern Powerhouse |
19 | *Inverness & Highland City |
20 | Leeds City Region |
21 | Leicester and Leicestershire |
22 | Liverpool City Region |
23 | London |
24 | Norfolk |
25 | Northamptonshire |
26 | North East |
27 | Oxfordshire |
28 | Sheffield City Region |
29 | Surrey, West Sussex & East Sussex |
30 | Swindon |
31 | Suffolk |
32 | Tees Valley |
33 | Telford & Wrekin |
34 | West Midlands |
35 | West of England |
36 | Wiltshire |
37 | Worcestershire |
38 | York, North Yorkshire and East Riding |
“
Experts called in for local plan development
Planning Minister Brandon Lewis today (15 September 2015) launched a new group of experts to help streamline the local plan-making process.
The 8-strong panel will consider how it can be simplified with the aim of slashing the amount of time it takes for local authorities to get them in place.
This will provide greater certainty to communities regarding plans for new homes and infrastructure in their area, while speeding up the planning process so developers can get on site quicker.
Members include:
- Chair John Rhodes of planning consultants Quod
- Adrian Penfold from developers British Land
- Richard Harwood QC from legal firm 39 Essex Chambers
- Councillor Toby Elliott from Swindon Borough Council
- Keith Holland, a retired Senior Planning Inspector
- Liz Peace, formerly of the British Property Federation
- John Howell MP, member for Henley
- Derek Stebbing, Local Authority Plans Manager for Chelmsford City Council
Planning Minister Brandon Lewis said:
Our planning reforms have caught the imagination of communities across the country, allowing them to bring forward developments that are a real benefit to local people.
However, while many have seized this opportunity, it’s fair to say the process of getting Local Plans in place can sometimes be lengthy and complicated.
That’s why we’ve brought together this panel of experts to help look at ways to streamline the process. Their first-class advice will help councils push on and deliver the homes and infrastructure that their communities need.
Local Plans give communities more say in how their area will develop from the amount of housing they need to the infrastructure that has to be put in place to help them thrive.
The government launched a radical reform of the planning system in 2012, reducing the amount of policy from more than 1,000 pages to just 52 and putting Local Plans at the heart of the system.
In total, 276 local authorities have published Local Plans to date with 216 adopted so far. However, that means more than a third of local planning authorities have yet to adopt plans.
Today’s new group includes representatives from a range of backgrounds, including local authorities, developers, the legal industry and the Planning Inspectorate.
Because plan-making involves a wide range of considerations, the remit of the group will be broad and cover any aspect of the Local Plan-making process that they feel is relevant, calling on experts in the field as they see fit. They are due to report back in the New Year.
Further information
The government committed in “fixing the foundations” published on 10 July 2015 to bringing forward proposals to significantly streamline the length and process of Local Plans.
To date, 82% of local authorities (276) have published Local Plans and 64% (216) have adopted them – in contrast, 33% (112) of councils had published and 17% (59) adopted Local Plans in May 2010.
The government recently wrote to the Planning Inspectorate urging them to take a pragmatic approach to examining local plans, to ensure they are put into place as quickly as possible.
So people can see how their area is performing, there will be league tables setting out the progress councils have made.
Councils have until early 2017 to produce Local Plans. In cases where no Local Plan has been produced the Government will intervene to arrange for a Local Plan to be written, in consultation with local people.
If you would like to make any views in the context of how plan-making could be improved, please contact the Department’s Local Plan team atLocalPlans@communities.gsi.gov.uk.
Research by NHBC on mixed tenure
New research by the NHBC Foundation has found that house prices are not reduced on developments which successfully integrate social and private housing.
The research, ‘Tenure Integration in housing developments’ found that mixed tenure developments are now commonplace in the UK and, contrary to fears, do not negatively impact house prices as long as the design and the quality of the housing is of a high standard.
According to NHBC – the national housebuilders council:
” The NHBC Foundation, in collaboration with the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA), commissioned a review of existing literature to explore issues surrounding tenure integration in new housing developments.
It concludes that mixed tenure is now a part of UK life with most researchers agreeing that single tenure developments are now a thing of the past.
Integrated housing or ‘pepper-potting’ – where social and private homes are located side-by-side – are found to increase social cohesion. Meanwhile, developments which segregate social and private housing have higher rates of negative feelings and division.
The research shows that house builders and social landlords should consider a wider range of house types and sizes to further encourage social cohesion and stabilise neighbourhoods. This would encourage residents to move from private rented to purchase or for those in apartments to move into family housing.
The report recommends that more research should be carried out into how mixed tenure developments are managed as well as the impact of the boom of the private rented sector. High levels of privately-rented properties can damage community cohesion as there is a greater turnover of residents in these properties and a lack of management accountability from absentee landlords.
The report also found that popular mixed-tenure developments can become over popular and ‘gentrified’ driving out those on low incomes by pricing them out of an area.
Nick Raynsford, Chairman of the NHBC Foundation, said that in the past, there was an ‘unsound’ assumption that people of different economic or social status should be housed in separate locations – leading to extensive problems of deprivation and social exclusion on stigmatised ‘sink estates’.
He said: “The move to promote integrated tenure over the past two decades is entirely understandable and appropriate. But inevitably questions have been raised about how this is best achieved and how to respond to potential problems.
“This report reviews the evidence about tenure integration in new housing developments and provides a very useful summary covering a range of different themes. Most of the conclusions are encouraging.
“The evidence does not suggest that there are immovable barriers to successful mixed-tenure developments, and demonstrates that fears that such developments will threaten the value of owner-occupied housing are not substantiated.
“They do point to the need for careful planning and good design to ensure the creation of successful communities and they reinforce the case for high-quality management.”
Jane Briginshaw, Head of Design and Sustainability at the HCA said: “I am pleased to help shed light on such an important issue and on some of the myths that surround it. The report shows how integrated housing can increase social cohesion and does not negatively affect house prices when associated with high standards. “
HCA statistaical release
The SDR collects data on stock size, types, location and rents at 31 March each year, and data on sales and acquisitions made between 1 April and 31 March.
-
Statistical Data Return 2014 to 2015
- Statistics – national statistics
-
Statistical Data Return 2013 to 2014
- Statistics – national statistics
-
Statistical Data Return 2012 to 2013
- Statistics – national statistics
-
Statistical Data Return 2011 to 2012
- Statistics – national statistics