The Housing Budget 2020 – round up

There are a number of articles of note out there. here is a summary for those wishing to scan the news:

This is a useful summary from Inside Housing:

“The key housing-related measures announced today:

  • A new Affordable Homes Programme of £12bn
  • A £1bn Building Safety Fund to remove unsafe cladding from buildings
  • £650m of funding to help rough sleepers into permanent accommodation
  • £400m for ambitious regional mayors to build homes on brownfield sites
  • Promise to announce measures to change the planning system
  • A 1% cut on the Public Works Loan Board interest rate, used by local authorities to fund housebuilding
  • A temporary removal of the minimum income floor (which calculates assumed earnings for self-employed people) in
  • Universal Credit as part of the government’s response to coronavirus
  • £200m for communities in areas that repeatedly experience flooding

Development: The new Affordable Homes Programme gets a £12bn multi-year settlement. Interest rates for loans from the Public Works Loan Board, which are used by councils for housebuilding, will be cut by 1%, making £1bn available. The government will also consult on the future of the PWLB. A total of £1.1bn of new allocations through the Housing Infrastructure Fund have been confirmed, to open up 70,000 homes in areas of high demand across country. There will be a new £400m fund for regions to build on brownfield sites. The housing secretary is expected to put forward comprehensive reforms for planning tomorrow.

Homelessness: A new £650m fund will help move rough sleepers into temporary accommodation. Mr Sunak says this will fund 6,000 places.

Climate: The government pledges to move towards equalising levy rates on electricity and gas. From April 2022 it will freeze the levy on electricity and raise it on gas. Investing £500m to support the roll-out of new rapid-charging hubs.

Floods: Communities hit by flooding will get a share of £120m to shore up existing defences and repair properties damaged during the winter, with an extra £200m to build flood resilience for communities repeatedly affected. Spending on flood defences will be doubled to £5.2bn over the next six years.

Coronavirus: The government has committed to a £12bn plan to respond to the economic impact of coronavirus. This includes a pledge of a £500m boost to the welfare system. For those who do not qualify for sick pay, it will become easier to access benefits. Those on Contributory Employment and Support Allowance will be able to claim from day one instead of day eight. The minimum income floor for Universal Credit will be temporarily removed for people who are self-employed and there will be no need to physically visit job centres. There will be a £500m hardship fund for local authorities to deal with coronavirus.”

The Northern Housing Consortium’s on the day briefing is here:

Budget-2020-On-the-day-briefing-text-version

Altair’s briefing is here: 

The Budget 2020: The Key Facts for Housing

We also like this from Altair to review as part of your governance: https://altairltd.co.uk/2020/03/ten-thing-for-2020/

 

David Tolson Partnership

https://www.dtp.uk.com/#views

 

Organisational Culture

Here is some top advice  to help Boards  to ensure their organisations healthy, regardless of the sectors in which they operate.

  1. “Do you understand the culture of your organisation, at leadership level and across the staff team? If no, what steps are you taking to understand it?
  2. How does the organisation foster and promote diversity and inclusion, and how do you ensure that bad practice is challenged and tackled?
  3. How does your organisation develop its potential and emerging leaders?
  4. When you recruit a chief executive or senior executive, especially one who is new to that level of seniority, do you ask them to consider engaging a coach or a mentor (as appropriate)?
  5. How well do you understand the way that services are delivered and staff managed across the organisation? How would you know if something was seriously awry?
  6. Are there any tell-tale signs that things may be amiss? Unusual behaviours, perhaps from ‘larger than life’ characters? Too many sudden staff departures, grievances, employment tribunals and the like?
  7. How open are your structures to whistle-blowing? Is there a direct route to the board or audit committee if required?
  8. When you recruit a chief executive or senior executive, are you open to being challenged? If you have a strong internal candidate, do you test them against the best the market can offer? And what due diligence do you require with external candidates and their track records?”

This extract is from an article in Inside Housing by Greg Campbell at Cambell Tickell consultants

New regulation update from the RSH

The approach the Regulator of Social Housing takes to regulation, including what we can expect from them, how they work and how they intervene has been refreshed on 5th March 2020.

You can find it here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulating-the-standards

Increase in Regulator Fees for registered landlords

England’s Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) has confirmed its plans to increase fees for housing associations by 15% in 2020/21

Fees_guidance_2020

The RSH expects to make £14.74m from the fees over the year, compared with £12.75m in 2019/20.

  • The new guidance confirms that fees for housing associations owning 1,000 homes or more according to the RSH’s Statistical Data Return will be £5.42 per social housing unit in 2020/21, up from £4.72 in 2019/20.
  • Fees for small providers with less than 1,000 homes will stay at £300 a year and the initial registration fee will not be increased from the current rate of £2,500.
  • Registered providers that are part of a group structure in which the parent entity is registered with the RSH will be charged a single fee to the parent. Where the parent is unregistered, the fee is collected from each individual provider in the group

Scrutiny.Networking – 22 January 2020

Here is the agenda – thanks to Leeds CC for hosting

Agenda Scrutiny.Net Leeds CC 22.01.20

Here is the conservative manifesto on housing:

The conservative manifesto (housing)

Here is the presentation we discussed on regulatory assessments involving customers:

22.01.20Resident engagement in consumer regulation assessments

 

Here is an example self assessment or 2 for you to try:

TIES SA Template 2020V

NC SA template

 

Here is the new star framework – webinar slides discussed:

The new STAR framework webinar slides FINAL

I will invite Housemark to the next meeting, as agreed.

 

Here is in communities shared strategy for change – Customer Voices:

Customer Voice Strategy_SD_public

 

Here is the link to how housing is allocated:

https://housingevidence.ac.uk/news/mhclg-focus-groups-to-explore-how-social-housing-is-allocated-in-england/

 

Grenfell recommendations Phase One from Sir Martin

These have all been accepted and agreed by govt

There is no date for their implementation yet!

Evacuation

There were no plans to evacuate Grenfell Tower available. Sir Martin Moore-Bick, chair of the Grenfell Inquiry, recommended:

The development of national guidelines for carrying out partial or total evacuations of high-rise buildings – including protecting fire access routes and procedures for evacuating people who require assistance Fire services develop policies for partial or total evacuation of high rises Owner and manager be required to draw up and keep under review evacuation plans, with copies provided to local fire and rescue services and placed in an information box on the premises
All high-rise buildings be equipped with facilities to enable the sending of an evacuation signal to the whole or a selected part of the building.
Owners and managers be required by law to prepare personal evacuation plans for residents who may struggle to do so personally, with information about them stored in the premise’s information box

All fire services be equipped with smoke hoods to help evacuate residents down smoke-filled stairs

Fire doors

Sir Martin said it is apparent that “ineffective fire doors allowed smoke and toxic gases to spread through the building more quickly than should have been possible”, and that missing self-closers played an important role. He recommended:

An urgent inspection of fire doors in all buildings containing separate dwellings, whether or not they are high rises
A legal requirement on the owner or manager of these buildings to check doors at least every three months to ensure self-closing devices are working effectively
Sprinklers

Noting the recommendation from the coroner investigating the Lakanal House fire that the use of sprinklers be encouraged, Sir Martin said that some of his experts had “urged me to go a step further and to recommend such systems be installed in all existing high-rise buildings”.

He said that sprinklers have “a very effective part to play” in an overall scheme of fire safety, but that he had not yet heard evidence about their use. He said that he could make no recommendations at this stage, but that he would consider the matter in phase two.

Internal signage

Floor numbers in the tower were not clearly marked and markings were not updated when the floor numbers changed following the refurbishment. Sir Martin said that all high-rise buildings should have floors clearly marked in a prominent place, which would be visible in low light or smoky conditions. Given that not all residents of Grenfell could read fire information signs, he said this should now be provided in a means that all residents can understand.

Use of combustible materials

Sir Martin said the original fire in the kitchen was no more than an ordinary kitchen fire that spread to the cladding because of “the proximity of combustible materials to the kitchen windows” – such as the uPVC frames.

He said this is a matter that “it would be sensible” for owners of other high-rise buildings to check.

He said he would “add his voice” to those who have expressed concern about the slow pace of removal work for more than 400 other tall buildings in England with aluminium composite material cladding.

A total of 97 buildings in the social housing sector and 168 in the private sector have not yet seen the work complete. Sir Martin said the work must be completed “as vigorously as possible”.

He said particular attention should be paid to decorative features, given the crucial role played by the architectural crown at Grenfell in spreading the fire around the building.

Given the decision to ban combustible materials on new buildings last year, he did not call for further restrictions on their use.

Fire service: knowledge and understanding of materials in high-rise buildings

Sir Martin raised concern that junior firefighters were not aware of the danger of cladding fires, and that the London Fire Brigade (LFB) was unaware of the combustible materials used to refurbish Grenfell Tower.

He therefore recommended:

  • That the owner and manager of every high-rise building is required to provide details of external walls and the materials used to the local fire service, and inform them of any changes
  • To ensure that fire services personnel at all levels understand the risk of cladding fires

Plans

Sir Martin said that a lack of plans did not “unduly hamper” fire services at Grenfell, as each floor was laid out in the same way. However he warned that another building with a more complex layout could pose problems. He recommended:

That owners and managers of high-rise buildings are required by law to provide paper and electronic versions of building plans of all high rises to local fire services….To ensure the building contains a premises information box, including a copy of floor plans

Lifts

Firefighters were unable to use a mechanism that allows them to take control of the lifts on the night of the fire, hampering their progress and meaning residents could still use the lifts, “in some cases with fatal consequences”. Sir Martin therefore recommended:

That the owner and manager of every high-rise building be required by law to carry out regular inspections of any lift required for use by firefighters and the mechanism that allows them to take control of it
Section 7(2)(d) of the Fire and Rescue Services Act

The judge was concerned that inspections of the tower by the fire service before the fire were not enough to meet their responsibilities under this act. He recommended:…A revision of the guidance for the London Fire Brigade, and training for all officers above the rank of crew manager in inspecting high-rise buildings
Co-operation between emergency services

There was a lack of communication between each emergency service at Grenfell, with each declaring a major incident at different times without telling each other. Sir Martin recommended several changes to ensure better communication in the future.

Personal fire protection

Sir Martin decided not to issue a recommendation that individual flats be provided with fire extinguishers or fire blankets, noting concerns that this could encourage residents to fight fires rather than escape and call the emergency services.

Communication between the control room and the incident commander

While guidance calls for a “free flow” of information between a fire service control room and the commanding officer on the ground, that often does not happen. Sir Martin therefore recommended:

A review of policies by the LFB on this matter, including training for all officers who could serve as incident commanders and senior control room officers.
A dedicated communications link between the senior officer and the incident commander
Emergency calls

Even allowing for the pressure of the night, Sir Martin said that fire survival guidance calls were not handled in an “appropriate or effective way”. He therefore recommended:

  • Amending of policies and training for control room officers
  • That all fire services develop policies for multiple fire survival guidance calls
  • Electronic systems to record and display calls
  • A policy for managing a transition from ‘stay put’ to ‘get out’ and training for call handlers in delivering this change of advice

Command and control

Sir Martin said firefighters too frequently “acted on their own initiative”, resulting in a duplication of effort. He called for better policies to ensure:

Better control of training and deployment
Information is obtained from crews after they have deployed

Equipment

Sir Martin made some recommendations for improvements to fire service equipment, including radios and the command support system.

Testing and certification of materials

Sir Martin said this is an issue that will be investigated “early in phase two”, along with an assessment of “whether the current guidance on how to comply with the building regulations is sufficiently clear and reliable”.

He also said the inquiry would investigate whether a ‘prescriptive’ regime of regulation was necessary. However, as these issues have not yet been examined by the inquiry he did not make any recommendations.

It is not clear when Phase two will be released

 

Early adopters invitations to LAs – Hackitt enq. recommendations

The government has invited a selection of local authorities to become ‘early adopters’ of recommendations proposed in the Hackitt Review of building safety.

The early adopters intend to ensure that the culture change surrounding high-rise building safety recommended by Dame Judith Hackitt in her government-commissioned review of fire safety and building regulations

Birmingham City Council – which owns more tower blocks than any other social landlord with over 200 – and Wandsworth Council have confirmed they will be joining the group.

HA wins first ever sustainable homes label

Clarion has become the first housing association in the UK to be approved for a newly created sustainable housing label, which aims to help affordable housing providers attract capital from impact investors.

The ‘Certified Sustainable Housing Label’ was created as a tool to measure the sustainability of housing providers based on 30 social and green indicators.

To get the label housing associations must prove they meet these indicators, which include tenant involvement, the installation of renewable energy sources and an emphasis on energy efficiency for new builds.

The indicators for the label mirror the United Nations’ goals for sustainable development, which have become the benchmark goals for impact investing.

Govt loses bedroom tax case

The government has lost its battle to impose the bedroom tax on partners of those with severe disabilities after the Supreme Court ruled that the sanctions breached their human rights.

Inside Housing reporting on 14th Nov:

“The unanimous judgement of the UK’s most senior court means that full housing benefit will be restored to 130 couples who had faced cuts to their benefits in England and Wales. There are also believed to be 25 similar cases in Scotland.

The court, which focused on a 14% reduction in benefits to a man only known as “RR”, deemed it was fair that the couple needed an extra bedroom for the their medical equipment. The ruling deemed that applying the reduction in benefits was a breach of his right to a home under the Human Rights Act.

RR is described as living with his severely disabled partner in a two-bedroom social housing property on which he claims housing benefit. The local authority, Sefton Council, applied regulation B13 of the bedroom tax and decided that, as they were a couple, they were only entitled to one bedroom.

Giving her judgement, judge Lady Hale said: “The Human Rights Act is an act of the United Kingdom parliament and takes precedence over subordinate legislation such as the regulation in question… This means that incompatible subordinate legislation must simply be ignored.” “

Scotland launches dementia practice guide

It is estimated that 90,000 people are living with dementia in Scotland.

A new practice framework aimed at improving the way that housing organisations support people who have dementia was launched at an event in Edinburgh on 30 October. Housing and dementia: a practice framework for Scotland’s housing sector was commissioned by Healthcare Improvement Scotland’s ihub in partnership with CIH Scotland and Alzheimer Scotland.

The Framework and supporting documents can be downloaded for free from www.cih.org/scotland/dementiaframework.