Here are some swapsies and the presentations – notes to follow:
HACT Insight tool
Tenant advisory presentation_Leeds_18th Jan 2018
Resident satisfaction
The report of work on tenant satisfaction will be reviewed Feb/March, when a report of HACTs work will be published.
HACT main focus has been actionable insight and to build trust with the customer base by acting on surveys.
Community Insight
HACT believe that the current surveys do not help landlords to make decisions for the community.
Many landlords employ researchers to gather data from up to 850 data sets and make sense of them, soem of which are by LA or postcode
The tool enables landlords to speed up the research part of the process using trusted data sites and enables you to project outcomes
Information can be mapped into hot spots which can support you to focus budget spend
It requires you to insert your data and that of subsidiaries – you can upload anything you wish – but HACT will advise you of the benefits and limitations of some local data.
Some examples of how the tool has been used:
- A2Dominion – health in areas and focus on loneliness, lone parents, widows, life satisfaction and well being
- What additions could be supported by a HA working locally?
- The-Missing-Million-report-FINAL
21st century Peabody are generous in sharing their research
The tool can support or clarify landlord spending habits
21st-century-peabody-report
HACT happy to talk to anyone about he use of the tool in their organisation
There was a debate about smaller org clubbing together or supporting LAs to buy the tool for multiple use in lcoal communities.
The local partnership with LAs would supply even more local data
With HACT’s support we then went on to discuss local grant giving and how the tool could support this:
Customer Involvement – managing grants to local communities
HACT brought to our attention 360 giving
Community Grants have been reviewed by 360 degree giving – useful grant finder site for landlords and CI staff.
www.threesixtygiving.org
360 Giving supports organisations to publish their grants data in an open, standardised way and helps people to understand and use the data in order to support decision-making and learning across the charitable giving sector.
Trafford HT have a £2m social dividend (9000 units).
Previously they managed this through Community Panel grants of £150k per area and a separate Neighbourhood solutions budget managed by front line staff.
Current funding is more targeted on the social objectives set by board, including:
- Grants and loans
- business start up
- micro grants to support people into new employment
A virtual group reviews forms and feeds in their ideas into an investment board – who make the decision – this includes a manager and 2-3 staff
The approach is relatively new. THT will host our meeting in July when we can find our more
Connect:
Budget is £20k – the criteria and policy goes through a small committee – the budget is reducing.
Habinteg:
£11 pp for 2300 homes = £23k – very small grants up to £3k available
Item 4.4 – Tenant Led Improvement Budget Procedure Supporting Documentation
Leeds
£450k discretionary budget
Locality funding
TARA and Housing Officers make applications and a tenant Panels selects
The TP team oversee quality control
From Leeds:
Housing Advisory Panel_
Funding Application Form 2017_
18 HAP Checklist Housing Advisory Panel_
Funding Guidance Notes 2017_18
The ‘checklist’ used for our grants/community fund and copy of the form and guidance notes – and thinking about our enabling role we have customised/branded a standard product from IDOX that we are marketing as www.fundingleeds.co.uk
Information about VITAL (The Voice of Involved Tenants across Leeds) – our strategic tenant body that aims to consider and input into policy and strategy development at the early stage, and help us design our approach to wider engagement. This is being reviewed by the group at the moment, and deliberately trying to keep it informal and accessible. (so less about quorate issues for example, more about getting the right people round the table to influence)
Incommunities
£40-50k for 22,000 units
This was managed by area panels, now area panels do not exist – a new Community trust panel has replaced this
Tenant group agree criteria and priorities for allocation of funding
TARAs and community grants
Here is some info shared between members:
also see LMH ComMutual website :
www.commutual.org.uk/community-initiative-fund-guidance-and-criteria
Here is some info from their previous work as LMH
New Association Start up Grant
LMH-6 Office Expenditure Grant LMH
LMH funding Monitoring Form
Grant Checklist LMH-5
GRANT APP LMH-1
Conditions of Grant Aid LMH
Task and finish thought provoker
T&F thoughts YD
We agreed this was a successful way of engaging and usefully instant with results.
Some of the uses which we had been tried and discussed included:
- Allocations process review- speaking to those who had recently moved in and those who were leaving
- Supported working with staff in a project team
- A useful and fresh way to engage new service users
- Speaking to tenants who had refused for kitchen and rewire refusals
- Disrepair
- checking out questions which are understandable prior to survey – use of snap survey and support for the Coms team
- Website functionality
- Developing the net promoter score – why would you/not recommend our company to friends and family?
- Sustainability support for tenants – energy efficiency advice
Regulatory advice on the 3 years review – Tenant Involvement and Empowerment Regulatory Standard (TIE)
See one slide above which is a copy of the standard’s requirement.
You may be reading too much into this.
Governance review – should cover engagement and listening to the voice of customers.
Scrutiny by tenants does not need to be a scrutiny panel – how do your tenants apply the cross cutting TIE standard to all other standards? e.g. what tenant scrutiny is there in right first time repairs (the home standard).
Ring me – i have more info for you 07867974659
Complaints
Check list July 2017
Complaints Handling Process July 2017
Complaints Policy July 2017 Approved
The most developed complaint scrutiny by tenants is done at Southway.
The offer includes:
- A customer internal service review group
- Reviews performance on all complaints within time and trends on complaints in specific services
- Reviews 6-8 cases of their choice for the detailed outcome based on the complaint and all the correspondence etc to ensure the compliant has been responded to fully, is customer focused and reasonable and report on this
- Lessons learnt are reported to Executive and captured in you said – we did
- Tenant advocates – trained to support other customers who have a compliant and are not able to fully articulate their problem
- Independent Tenant Solutions – a designated panel with other landlords – Salix, New Charter, For Viva etc.
Connect also engage tenants in a similar way in the complaint process
Incommunities use an independent person to review the compliant, tenants review the performance and timescales.
Tenant engagement in Policy
Discussion
EMT are taking an increased delegated policy approval from Committees and Boards due to increased workload for governers.
- Is it the policy or the implementation of this – the procedure which would impact greater on tenants – how are tenants engaged in the process/customer journey?
- It needs to be a quality based conversation – first come capacity building to help the participants understand the service and parameters
- Task and finish is a useful tool for building in tenant opinion prior to reviewing the approach
- Ensuring Board/Council are aware of their ability to challenge and having a special section on customer/stakeholder consultation/opinion in approval papers
Plus Dane send back policies which are not deemed to have sufficient and appropriate consultation – tested at Exec team
Habinteg review consultation prior to approval and call officers to account – Your Voice Panel
Southway Resident Consultative panel reviews policy prior to board
Incommunities Community trust panel review policies prior to approval at Policy and performance Committee – this is changing now to EMT approval
Champions of specific services from Consultation Panels can help at Board – Trafford HT
Tenant appraisals
Habinteg appraise the Chair of their groups who then appraise the other members
PlusDane appraise their Scrutiny Panel
THT appraise their Chair through 360 degree assessment and from this a training plan is developed
Incommunities have developed an appraisal form to go out to members, they are going to appraise their Community Trust Panel and will be collectively appraising their Panel independently. They have amended a form used by another landlord:
CTP self assessment questionnaire 2018
Here is a copy of an appraisal for LMH, at that time the LMH SP Chair also being a member of the Customer Services Committee of Board
Self assessment for LMH Chair
SP Ind Chair role profile and person spec
Up and coming events
Kate Maughen was to attend to tell us about Rethinking Social Housing where tenants and landlords can attend one of their events, or run their won using the CIH toolkit. See NHC website for details of events across the north
Ian shared his notes from what tenants want – fed into national consultation post Grenfell
Leeds Objective Oct 4
This has slowed due to the new Housing Minister appointment – a report is due out soon – no date!
Dates for future S.Net meetings and offers of venues – thanks for the following offers – i will confirm you as soon as we have a room confirmed
11th April – Southway
4th July – Weaver Vale
4th October – Trafford Housing Trust
23rd January – Habinteg